Campus Progress is now Generation Progress! Find out more »

VOICES

Pulitzer Prize Winner on How the Sequester Will Affect Youth

david.jpg

David Leonhardt speaking at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. in September 2012

CREDIT: Flickr: Zocalo Public Square

With the sequester looming on the horizon, the Center for American Progress hosted a discussion with Pulitzer Prize winner and New York Times D.C. Bureau Chief David Leonhardt about automatic spending cuts poised to go into effect next week to reduce the national deficit, that is unless Congress acts first.The conversation focused on Leonhardt’s new e-book, "Here’s the Deal." 

“Historically the most successful way to cut the deficit is not through either tax increases or spending cuts, but it’s through economic growth,” Leonhardt said, explaining the thesis of the book. 

Leonhardt cited three main causes for concern in the long-term economy:

1. The deficit
2. Low growth and unemployment
3. Climate change

“The kinds of things that promote growth in the broadest terms are investments,” he said, emphasizing a key "smart strategy" to reduce the deficit.

Leonhardt said two key areas we need to invest in are education and clean energy

Neera Tanden, CEO and President of the Center of American Progress (our parent organization) moderated the discussion. She said that while this idea of economic growth seems to make common sense, it is a point generally absent from the national debate. Instead, she noted, the conversation is structured around the deficit.

Leonhardt said that this may be true because it “feels right” to people to focus on debt, especially with the popular analogy that compares the federal government budget to a household budget.

But despite what "feels right" to many people, Leonhardt expressed concerned about the sequester's potential effect on economic growth.

“Basically what we are doing is focusing our cuts on people under the age of 65 and sparing people over 65. And if you think about what economic growth is, it’s about the future. And so it’s not shocking that if you focus cuts on the young, you’re doing more damage," he said.

Despite the nearing cuts and a seeming increased partisan divide in Congress, Leonhardt said:

“After periods when the economy has been really weak, it’s tempting to conclude that it’s going to be weak forever…I am still hopeful that there are a number of scenarios in which growth picks up, whether it’s because in fact that educational attainment has risen a little bit in the last few years after stagnating, [or] health costs finally seem to be slowing.”

If Congress fails to reach a compromise the sequester will go into affect on March 1, and many cuts are focused on young people. Some of these include:

The list goes on and included other programs like those dedicated to Native Americans, workplace safety, food safety, nutritional assistance for women and children, homelessness programs, and funding for the FBI and FEMA. 

 

 

Christine Dickason is a Communications Intern with Campus Progress. You can follow her on Twitter @cdickason11.

Like this article?

Share this Tweet this Email icon Email this
By clicking and submitting a comment I acknowledge the Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Use. I understand that my comments are also being governed by Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policies as applicable, which can be found here.